Zero tolerance.

lumberjackStatue-of-Liberty-crownI’m from the now notorious burg of Wasilla, Alaska, home to a fair number of far-right Christians, life-on-the-fringes Libertarians, and (believe it or not) Yellow Dog Democrats. Now I live in New York, a city that is at once relentlessly progressive and, at times, shockingly provincial. All this to say that I’ve had the great good fortune in my life to meet a fascinating array of people whose political ideologies, ethnic backgrounds, sexual orientations, and aesthetic sensibilities are wildly diverse.

Through the magic of Facebook, I’ve got at least a peripheral connection to, at last count, over 600 people from my past and present. Many of these fine folks post frequent personal and political diatribes on Facebook, and as I read the Facebook “news feed” every morning, my past and present worlds converge in a virtual cacophony of dissenting opinions and (often) uncivil discourse.

facebook_logoI’ve got Facebook friends who are religious, atheistic, conservative, liberal, gay, straight, married, single…you get the idea. And I’ve noticed that one thing almost everyone seems to have in common is a firm belief in his or her “tolerance” of other people’s “lifestyles” and opinions. Yet, the language used in many Facebook posts and comments is the opposite of “tolerant.”

Conversations about hot-button topics like health care reform, same sex marriage, Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize, and the New York Yankees often degenerate into dialogues scarcely worthy of a junior-high cafeteria squabble. People whom I know to be intelligent, thoughtful, and fully capable of nuanced discussion downshift into name-calling and sweeping generalizations.

Lumping people with whom we disagree into categories like “knee-jerk liberals” and “right-wing nut-jobs” means never having to dig deeper than our preconceived notions about who “they” are and what “they” believe. Our beliefs remain unchallenged and we can make snarky jibes to our heart’s content. Unfortunately, we also forfeit one of the greatest opportunities that the internet affords us: the ability to engage in authentic, honest, real-time discourse with people from all over the world.

I think part of the problem might be the idea of “tolerance” itself. By definition, the word implies a begrudging willingness to “put up with” something or someone outside our sphere of familiarity. What if we strove toward openness and curiosity instead?question-marks

I’m not suggesting nor advocating that we should all agree on everything; such monochromatic accord would make for boring Facebook-ing and a boring world. I am suggesting, though, that we actually take the time to ask people, “Why do you feel the way you do?” rather than categorically dismiss their opinions as irrelevant based on their zip code, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or political party affiliation.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from my years in Wasilla and New York, it’s that people very seldom conform neatly to our pre-fabbed stereotypes; we humans are as multi-faceted and complex as the issues we face. I truly believe that if we genuinely seek to understand one another, we can be accepting–and, yes, tolerant–of others even if we passionately disagree with their point of view.


9 thoughts on “Zero tolerance.

  1. HEY! Its Kevin, we went to school together! Its Funny, I also grew up born and raised in Alaska, but since then have traveled the world and finally settled for the time being in Los Angeles. I actually live in West Hollywood for a time, which is renowned for being a majority homosexual community. It was funny for me since i think i had met maybe 2 or 3 gay people in my whole life prior to moving a block away from ‘boys town’ some people call it. And me being straight and from Alaska, most people would probable assume i was freaked out on a daily basis, but honestly i wasnt in the least. People are people, ive met gay, straight, right wing, left wing, religious, atheist, and every color of person there is. Its all good. I also have had a problem with the word ‘tolerance’. To me it implied exactly that, i was putting up with something that i might have a problem with. Like how i tolerate a leaf blower outside my window at 7am. That shouldnt be the way we view people or beliefs that differ from ours. Anyhoo, ive had a lot of coffee and could go on forever, just wanted to say hi and great article! email me!


  2. i have frequently heard “tolerance” characterized as negative by those in the homosexual community. perhaps “respect” and “acceptance” are more productive goals. if we disagree, then we disagree. i can accept that. i can respect your informed beliefs. i get bugged when folks with whom i disagree try to force us to agree. when they realize how attached i am to my informed opinions, they tolerate me….or they don’t. meanwhile, i can only do my best to accept and respect them.

    i hear you, hil. civil discourse, to be sure.

  3. Tolerance…… about embracing differences instead. “Embrace me, my sweet embraceable you”.
    Love this blog……… always

    • I like that, Mimi—embracing differences is where it’s at. It’s OK if we don’t all agree. My problem with the notion of “tolerance” is that I think “putting up” with someone’s differing opinion is a way of closing the conversation. “They” think this way, therefore I will tolerate–but not listen to–“them.” And when we do that, we miss the chance to celebrate a world that creates so many interesting people and nuanced situations. Thanks for reading!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s